A Comparative Study between Standard and Modified Salter Pelvic Osteotomy: Intermediate-Term Outcomes in Walking-Age Children with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32007/jfacmedbaghdad3386Keywords:
Acetabular index, Developmental dysplasia of the hip, Modified Salter pelvic osteotomy, Salter pelvic osteotomy, Wiberg Center-Edge AngleAbstract
Background: Children who present late with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) often require pelvic osteotomy to achieve adequate femoral head coverage and long-term hip stability. Standard Salter osteotomy (SO) is a well-established procedure; however, modified Salter osteotomy (MSO) has been introduced to improve acetabular orientation and radiographic coverage.
Objective: To compare MSO and standard SO regarding clinical and radiological outcomes in children presenting late with DDH at intermediate-term follow-up.
Methods: This prospective comparative study included 15 children/18 hips with late-presenting DDH who randomly underwent either MSO or standard SO. The study was performed at the Orthopedic Department of the Children Welfare Teaching Hospital, Medical City Complex, Baghdad, during the period from April 1 to December 6, 2022. Clinical evaluation was performed using the McKay criteria and gait assessment. Radiological evaluation included measuring the acetabular index (AI) preoperatively and postoperatively, while the centre-edge angle (CEA) was measured at the 3-year follow-up. All patients were followed up for a minimum of three years.
Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of McKay grading, gait pattern, and hip stability. Radiologically, the MSO group demonstrated significantly better outcomes: AI improved from 33.7±5.72 to postoperatively 17.6±3.44, while in the SO AI improved from 35.1±4.75 to postoperatively 20.3±3.8 (p< 0.001), CEA in SO 26.9±5.26, while in MSO was 30.8± 4.65° (p= 0.002). No re-dislocation were observed during the follow-up period.
Conclusion: Both modified and standard Salter osteotomies are safe and effective procedures for treating late-presenting DDH. However, the modified Salter osteotomy provides superior radiological correction, as demonstrated by improved acetabular parameters, while achieving clinical outcomes comparable to those of standard Salter osteotomy.
Received: 02 June 2026,
Revised: 03 Sept. 2026,
Accepted: 15 Sept. 2026,
Published Online: Sept. 2026
References
1. Suvorov V, Filipchuk V. Salter pelvic osteotomy for the treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: assessment of postoperative results and risk factors. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022 May 31;14(4):35335. https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.35335.
2. Lucchesi G, Sacco R, Zhou W, et al. DDH in the Walking Age: Review of Patients with Long-Term Follow-Up. Indian J Orthop. 2021 Sep 29;55(6):1503-1514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-021-00531-1.
3. van Stralen RA, Colo E, Rutz E, et al. Long-Term Results After Salter Innominate Osteotomy for the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip—Only 8% Rate of Total Hip Arthroplasty at a Median Follow-Up of 22 Years. Children. 2024; 11(12):1525. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121525
4. Zhang Y, Lu Y, Zhang Y, et al. Outcome analysis of the autologous bone grafts for reconstructing acetabular bone defects in total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Front Surg. 2025 Sep 11;12:1655246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1655246.
5. Esmaeilnejad-Ganji SM, Esmaeilnejad-Ganji SMR, Zamani M, et al. A Newly Modified Salter Osteotomy Technique for Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of Hip That Is Associated with Decrease in Pressure on Femoral Head and Triradiate Cartilage. Biomed Res Int. 2019 Feb 6;2019(1):6021271. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6021271.
6. Vasyl S, Viktor F. Modified salter pelvic osteotomy for the DDH treatment. Acta Ortop Bras. 2023 Apr 17;31(spe1):e259040. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233101e259040.
7. Azhideh A, Hosseini N, Haseli S, et al. Osteotomies: Indications, Imaging Appearance, Surgical Techniques, and Complications. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 8;15(10):1184. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101184.
8. Domos G, Váncsa S, Szeverényi C, et al. Rates and risk factors for failure of reduction in closed reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Rev. 2024 Sep 2;9(9):908-922. https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-24-0007.
9. Wada A, Sakalouski A, Nakamura T, et al. Angulated Salter osteotomy in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2022 May 1;31(3):254-259. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000883.
10. Tejpal T, Shanmugaraj A, Gupta A, et al. Outcomes and complications of patients undergoing Salter's innominate osteotomies for hip dysplasia: a systematic review of comparative studies. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2021 Mar 19;7(4):621-630. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnab014.
11. Ali A, Khan Q, Khan I, et al. Acetabular index correction by dega osteotomy in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) surgery. Med Forum Monthly 2024; 35(4):69-73. https://medicalforummonthly.com/index.php/mfm/article/view/4369
12. Li M, Zhou Q, Liu Y, et al. Acetabular index is the best predictor of late residual acetabular dysplasia after closed reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip. Int Orthop. 2018;42(3):631–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3726-5.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license..
