Guide for Reviewers

Please, consider the following points if possible:
Q1- Does the research subject match your area of interest? If not, please decline the review request please visit the OJS review process.
Q2- Do you have a potential conflict of interest? If yes, please disclose this to the Editor of the Journal, please visit   COPE Conflict of Interest.

Q3- Does the abstract reflect precisely the article’s objective? If not, please suggest new objectives according to the review form attached to the manuscript.
Q4-Does the research question /hypothesis clearly defined and the objective properly derived? If not, please suggest new objectives according to the review form attached to the manuscript.
Q5- Does the method describe how to collect and analyze the participant/patients’ data? If not, please visit   COPE Guidelines for Publication.
Q6- Does the author apply the Core Practice of Medical Ethics, when dealing with patients and /or animal data? If not, please inform the editorial board to take the required action.
Q7- Do the Interpretation and conclusions sufficiently derive from the result by focusing on selected data? If not, please visit COPE Guidelines for Publication.
Q8- Is the overall study design appropriate and adequate to answer the research objective? If not, please follow the guidelines and the instructions to Authors, COPE Guidelines for Publication

Q9. Does the manuscript include a clear statement on Data Availability? Ensuring 
that the underlying data is accessible—either through a repository link or a detailed availability
note—is essential for transparency and reproducibility.